Manufacturing throughput consulting · Greater Seattle

The capacity you need is already on your floor

Fixed-fee throughput engagements for aerospace and space manufacturers doing discrete fabrication and assembly in the Greater Seattle area. I find the constraint on your floor, and every recommended move is tested in simulation before it is made.

Start the conversation

Results

From production floors I ran or consulted on.

55% area throughput increase at Boeing Fabrication's Interiors Responsibility Center, Everett. Scheduling, flow, and labor allocation changes, no capital added.
30% area throughput increase on a UAV composite airframe program at a WA aerospace company. Constraint-based production schedule, no added labor or equipment.
~$1.5M annualized savings delivered at a single plant in consulting with Falconi US, with a replication playbook written for the network's other eleven plants.

Who this is for

From independent shops to supplier sites of the major programs, the plants this practice serves live with a familiar pattern.

  • Missing ship commitments while overtime runs every week.
  • Scrap and rework absorbing hours the schedule needs.
  • A rate increase coming that the line may not hold.

The gap is rarely the equipment. It hides in handoffs, scheduling, and flow, and it usually closes with the people and machines already in place.

Services

A fixed ladder of three engagements, each building on the one before it.

Throughput Assessment

Fixed fee. Two weeks.

A study of one line or area. It finds the constraint on the floor, quantifies it, and delivers a sequenced set of no-capital moves your team can execute, with the evidence behind every step.

Assessment + Simulation Study

Fixed fee. Four weeks.

The Assessment extended with a discrete-event simulation model validated against the line's own measured behavior. Moves are tested before the floor commits, and the model shows where the constraint moves next, which is what makes the larger scheduling and staffing decisions safe to take.

Shown end to end in the case study

Multi-Site Engagement

Scoped per engagement, typically 6-10 weeks.

The Assessment method scaled across lines or sites. Validated models test rate increases, shift additions, and capacity decisions before money is spent.

See the method end to end

A representative Assessment + Simulation Study, built in full on a modeled fabrication area, shows the whole method at work. Floor thinking finds the constraint, simulation validates every move and shows where the constraint migrates next, and the area recovers its hidden capacity without capital.

Where the full study, Recovering hidden capacity, preparing for rate increases, lands the modeled area.

+46% deliverable capacity in the modeled area, demand met at straight time with the overtime gone.
~$1.1M a year of modeled waste reduced by four moves, with nothing spent to get it.
~157/day where a lean second shift carries the modeled area when the build rate climbs, counted separately.
Read the case study

Who runs the work

The practice is Daniil Tchistiakov, an industrial engineer who optimized production and built product to rate inside Boeing Fabrication, then worked as a management consultant across diverse manufacturing plants and as a simulation practitioner modeling lines before decisions get expensive. Every engagement starts the same way, on the floor, walking the line.

More about the practice

Daniil Tchistiakov

Have a line or area missing rate?

Send the current output, the target, and where you think the constraint is. I will tell you whether a short conversation makes sense.

Start the conversation